|Year : 2022 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 128-135
Opportunities for the Use of Brief Scalable Psychological Interventions to Support Mental Health and Wellbeing in the Context of the Climate Crisis
Alessandro Massazza1, Julian Eaton2, Mohamed Elshazly3, Fiona Charlson4, Jura L Augustinavicius5
1 PhD, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
2 MD, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; CBM Global Disability Inclusion, Mental Health Technical Area, Laudenbach, Germany
3 MD, Mental Health and Psychosocial Support Consultant, Egypt
4 PhD, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Queensland Health, Wacol; School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Qld, Australia; Department of Global Health, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
5 PhD, School of Population and Global Health, McGill University, Canada
|Date of Submission||27-Oct-2021|
|Date of Decision||08-Dec-2021|
|Date of Acceptance||19-Feb-2022|
|Date of Web Publication||31-May-2022|
Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London, WC1H 9SH
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Climate change is negatively impacting mental health through multiple pathways. Research to date has largely focused on characterising the link between climate change and mental health and no mental health and psychosocial support intervention has been explicitly designed to address the mental health consequences of climate change. In this commentary, we argue that brief, scalable psychological interventions represent an opportunity to fill this gap. Brief psychological interventions have been shown to be effective in the context of disasters, armed conflict and displacement, which have all been predicted to increase because of climate change. Brief psychological interventions are also likely to be relevant in the context of chronic climate stressors including temperature and sea-level rise or droughts. Additionally, they hold the potential to be used within a prevention and promotion framework, which is likely to be relevant in the context of increasing cumulative and overlapping climate-related adversities. Finally, brief psychological interventions could address several implementation challenges resulting from global climate change and could also be integrated with other programmes, including those that support climate change adaptation and mitigation. Research is urgently needed to provide evidence for the implementation and effectiveness of brief psychological interventions in the context of climate change.
Keywords: brief scalable psychological interventions, climate change, mental health and psychosocial support
|How to cite this article:|
Massazza A, Eaton J, Elshazly M, Charlson F, Augustinavicius JL. Opportunities for the Use of Brief Scalable Psychological Interventions to Support Mental Health and Wellbeing in the Context of the Climate Crisis. Intervention 2022;20:128-35
|How to cite this URL:|
Massazza A, Eaton J, Elshazly M, Charlson F, Augustinavicius JL. Opportunities for the Use of Brief Scalable Psychological Interventions to Support Mental Health and Wellbeing in the Context of the Climate Crisis. Intervention [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Sep 24];20:128-35. Available from: https://www.interventionjournal.org/text.asp?2022/20/1/128/346327
| Introduction|| |
Climate change exposures such as droughts, heatwaves and floods have been linked to several poor mental health outcomes from higher psychological distress to increased psychiatric hospitalisations and mortality among people with mental illness (Lawrance et al., 2021), as well as disruptions to mental health services (Elshazly et al., 2019). To date, however, very little intervention research has been conducted in this area (Charlson et al., 2021). Assessing the appropriateness, feasibility, effectiveness and scalability of mental health and psychosocial interventions (clinical and nonclinical) has been identified as a global research priority in the context of climate change (Charlson et al., 2022). However, while preliminary anecdotal evidence exists on mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) interventions in the context of climate change (CBM, 2021), no evidence-based interventions have been specifically developed with a view to addressing climate change impacts on mental health and supporting people as they adjust to a world affected by climate change.
We propose brief psychological interventions as a case example of one set of potentially useful evidence-based supports for mental health and wellbeing in the context of climate change. Many brief psychological interventions have been developed for settings affected by adversity (World Health Organization (WHO), 2017), making them potentially useful in the context of climate change. According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), brief scalable psychological interventions are “interventions (5–8 sessions) that can be delivered by nonspecialised staff after a brief training and with supportive clinical supervision” aimed at effectively addressing “mild and moderate mental health conditions” (UNHCR, 2021, p. 46). Most brief psychological interventions fall within the focused, nonspecialised support level of the Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) MHPSS pyramid (IASC, 2007). Examples of brief psychological interventions are provided in [Table 1].
|Table 1: Examples of Brief Scalable Psychological Interventions (Adapted from UNHCR, 2021, p. 46).|
Click here to view
The effectiveness and implementation advantages of many brief psychological interventions have been demonstrated in multiple settings affected by adversity (Ryan et al., 2021) and these settings are characterised by similar stressors to those caused and exacerbated by climate change (Augustinavicius et al., 2021). When appropriate, we will draw on examples from specific brief psychological interventions developed by the WHO (2017), although a variety of other brief psychological interventions exist (Haroz et al., 2020; Purgato et al., 2018; Ryan et al., 2021; UNHCR, 2021).
| The Role of Brief Psychological Interventions in Addressing Needs Associated with Acute and Chronic Climate Change-Related Stressors|| |
One important pathway through which climate change is affecting mental health is through an increase in frequency and intensity of extreme weather events such as hurricanes and floods (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, (IPCC), 2021). These events can occur in the context of other humanitarian crises, resulting in complex emergency situations and compounding risks to mental health and wellbeing (Elshazly et al., 2019). Extensive literature exists detailing the mental health consequences of various types of disasters (Goldmann & Galea, 2014) and brief psychological interventions have been shown to be effective in reducing symptoms of depression, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety and functional impairment following disasters caused by natural hazards (James et al., 2020; Zang et al., 2014). For example, the WHO intervention, Problem Management Plus (PM+), a brief, transdiagnostic intervention delivered by nonspecialists, was shown to be effective in decreasing psychological distress and depressive symptoms among people living in communities at repeated risk of landslides and flooding in Nepal (Jordans et al., 2021).
Preliminary evidence also highlights the linkages between climate change and armed conflict or organised violence (von Uexkull & Buhaug, 2021). Among other triggering factors, climate change can contribute to armed conflict indirectly by exacerbating existing social, economic and environmental tensions (Mach et al., 2019). Additionally, populations living in contexts of armed conflict tend to be more vulnerable to the impacts of climate change due to the limited adaptive capacity of people, systems and institutions already coping with conflict (ICRC, 2020). Considerable evidence indicates that populations affected by armed conflict experience higher rates of mental disorders compared to the general population (Charlson et al., 2019). As with disasters, various brief psychological interventions have proven effective in addressing mental health in the context of ongoing armed conflict (Weiss et al., 2015). For example, two pilot RCTs in conflict-affected areas of Pakistan have shown PM+ to be effective in addressing various mental health complaints (Khan et al., 2019; Rahman et al., 2016) and PM+ has been widely implemented in conflict-affected contexts (Dozio et al., 2021; Goloktionova & Mukerjee, 2021; Nemiro et al., 2021).
Both disasters and armed conflict resulting from climate change, as well as more slow-onset climate change stressors such as prolonged droughts, can result in significant displacement within and between countries (Kaczan & Orgill-Meyer, 2020). Projections from the World Bank estimate 143 million internal climate migrants by 2050 in the absence of climate action (World Bank, 2018). Internally displaced people and refugees can often experience several stressors in the pre-, peri- and postmigration phases which can increase their chances of experiencing mental health problems (Blackmore et al., 2020). As with the case of disaster and armed conflict, various brief psychological interventions have proven effective with displaced populations (Bogdanov et al., 2021; de Graaff et al., 2020; Murray et al., 2018; Tay et al., 2020). For example, Self-Help Plus (SH+), a multimedia-guided intervention delivered by lay facilitators and developed by WHO, led to reductions in psychological distress among South Sudanese refugees in northern Uganda (Tol et al., 2020).
In comparison with acute climate change-related extreme weather events, less is known about the mental health impacts and appropriate responses to more chronic and slow-onset climate stressors such as droughts, increasing temperatures and sea-level rise (Berry et al., 2010; Charlson et al., 2021). Emerging evidence points to the detrimental impacts that chronic climate stressors can have on mental health (Charlson et al., 2021). Although no brief psychological intervention has been tested specifically in the context of these more chronic climate stressors, brief psychological interventions have proven effective in reducing symptoms of depression, anxiety, PTSD and functional impairment within resource-constrained settings affected by other types of chronic stressors such as poverty and systemic violence (Bonilla-Escobar et al., 2018; Chibanda et al., 2015; Murray et al., 2020). For example, the WHO intervention, Thinking Healthy, was shown to be effective in reducing perinatal depression in a socioeconomically deprived rural area of Pakistan with high levels of poverty (Sikander et al., 2019). Future work might investigate the appropriateness, acceptability and feasibility of implementing existing brief psychological interventions in contexts affected by more chronic and slow-creeping climate stressors and explore the need for any adaptations.
| The Role of Brief Psychological Interventions in Preventing Mental Health Problems and Promoting Mental Health and Wellbeing amid Increasing Climate Change-Related Adversity|| |
Some interventions are delivered to reduce distress, symptoms of mental disorders and functional impairment, that is, a treatment focus, whereas others focus on preventing the development of mental disorders and promoting positive mental health and wellbeing, that is, a prevention or promotion focus (Eaton & Fallin, 2019). Most of the academic evidence on the effectiveness of mental health interventions in humanitarian settings, including brief psychological interventions, comes from randomised controlled trials focused on treatment and there is a paucity of studies investigating the preventive and promotive effects of these interventions (Papola et al., 2020; Tol, 2015). There is, however, some preliminary evidence for the preventive effects of brief psychological interventions like SH+, which was recently tested among refugees in Europe (Purgato et al., 2021) and, anecdotally, many community-based psychosocial interventions are often implemented in humanitarian settings within a prevention and promotion framework.
The lack of mental health prevention- and promotion-focused research is also apparent in mental health intervention studies conducted in contexts with acute climate change-related stressors, and in the general absence of intervention research in the context of chronic climate change-related stressors. While few studies have focused on them, intervention strategies that prevent the onset of adverse mental health outcomes and promote positive mental health and wellbeing are paramount in the context of climate change. As climate change further stretches social and health systems already operating past their capacity, brief psychological interventions with a prevention or promotion focus could serve as a buffer, complementing and enhancing treatment focused interventions. Positive mental health and wellbeing may also be integral to social engagement on climate change (White, 2020), including in adaptation and mitigation activities. Brief psychological interventions that promote mental health and wellbeing could be used to support people in coping and adjusting to life in a climate changed world, including as they grapple with difficult thoughts and feelings about climate change, such as those related to climate change anxiety and ecological grief (Clayton, 2020; Cunsolo et al., 2020). While further research is needed to understand these emerging constructs, these reactions to climate change are likely largely normative thus not necessarily requiring a treatment-oriented response (Ojala et al., 2021).
| The Role of Brief Psychological Interventions in Addressing MHPSS Implementation Challenges in the Context of Climate Change|| |
Climate change is a global phenomenon and will impact everyone in differential ways. However, its impacts will be most acutely experienced in communities more at risk of experiencing climate stressors and with less resource to cope with them. According to the Global Climate Risk Index 2021, the 10 countries most affected by climate-related extreme weather events in 2019 were Mozambique, Zimbabwe, the Bahamas, Japan, Malawi, Afghanistan, India, South Sudan, Niger and Bolivia, predominantly low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) (Eckstein et al., 2021). According to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), 8 out of 10 countries1 considered most vulnerable to the effects of climate change also had ongoing interagency humanitarian appeals in 2020 (OCHA, 2021). Therefore, various implementation challenges are likely to exist when providing MHPSS interventions in settings most affected by climate change.
For example, in several countries most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change there is a lack of mental health professionals meaning that a large proportion of people in need does not receive appropriate care (Patel et al., 2018). One advantage of brief psychological interventions is that they are often based on a task-shifting model whereby care is provided by lay experts without specialised mental health training such as community health workers, teachers or peers (Cohen & Yaeger, 2021). Lack of mental health professionals has also been addressed by developing interventions requiring lower levels of human resources such as self-help interventions like SH+ (Tol et al., 2020), digital interventions such as the WHO Step-by-Step intervention (Heim et al., 2021), group-based interventions (Tol et al., 2020) or peer support interventions (de Graaff et al., 2020).
Due to the far-reaching impacts of climate change, one additional implementation challenge will be that of scaling up effective treatments to large numbers of individuals and communities. While this remains a general challenge within the MHPSS field broadly (Roberts & Fuhr, 2019; Troup et al., 2021), different brief psychological interventions are currently being scaled up at country level, such as PM+ in Kenya (Koyiet et al., 2019) and SH+ in Uganda (Leku et al., under review) and possible pathways to scale up have been identified for various other countries (Fuhr et al., 2020). Additionally, different models for scale up of MHPSS interventions have been proposed (Jordans & Kohrt, 2020; Woodward et al., 2021). Some brief psychological interventions have characteristics that make them easier to scale. For example, SH+ is delivered in groups of 20–30 people at a time, thereby drastically increasing reach relative to interventions delivered to individuals or small groups at a time (Epping-Jordan et al., 2016).
One other important implementation advantage of existing brief psychological interventions is their transdiagnostic and modular nature. For example, the WHO Early Adolescents Skills for Emotions aims at mitigating symptoms of internalising disorders such as depression and anxiety and psychological distress in youth (Dawson et al., 2019), making it potentially relevant to large subgroups of the general population. The transdiagnostic nature of some brief psychological interventions also means that there is a reasonable expectation that they could be easily adapted to cover other mental health issues (e.g. see work on adapting PM+ to cover alcohol misuse; Fuhr et al., 2021).
Climate change requires interventions that are not only effective in reducing mental health symptoms but that can also be implemented effectively across settings. The scalable and adaptable nature of brief psychological interventions means they represent key candidates in this endeavour. Importantly, while many of these implementation challenges are likely to be particularly acute in LMICs, climate change will exacerbate them also in high-income countries. As a result, brief psychological interventions are likely to be relevant for high-income settings as well, as demonstrated in the context of other emergencies such as COVID-19 (McBride et al., 2021).
| The Potential for Brief Psychological Interventions to be Integrated into Other Programmes|| |
Climate change is also impacting mental health through multiple indirect pathways, by worsening social determinants of mental health. Climate change has already been linked to increased economic inequality globally (Diffenbaugh & Burke, 2019), heightened risk of gender-based violence (GBV AoR, 2021), and food insecurity (IPCC, 2019). Therefore, multisectoral interventions whereby MHPSS is integrated within other humanitarian programmes will be particularly relevant as the impacts of climate change become more intense. Integrated interventions are recommended in consensus-based guidelines on MHPSS in emergencies (IASC, 2007) and some brief psychological interventions (e.g. SH+) have been specifically identified as suitable for integration in other programmes (WHO, 2021).
Various integrated brief psychological interventions have been developed recently. For example, the Nguvu intervention aims at reducing intimate partner violence whilst improving psychosocial health and has been evaluated in Tanzania (Greene et al., 2021). Similarly, the Follow Up of Severely Malnourished Children (FUSAM) intervention combines components aimed at addressing acute malnutrition together with child and maternal mental health and has been evaluated in Nepal (Le Roch et al., 2018). In general, the brief and modular nature of brief psychological interventions means that they could easily be integrated within other programmes addressing stressors emerging from climate change.
One possible area of innovation specific to climate change would be the integration of brief psychological interventions with programmes that promote positive adaptation and mitigation strategies such as sustainable transportation, land management and nutrition programmes. While arguments have been made concerning the importance of integrating mental health within adaptation and mitigation strategies in general (Charlson et al., 2022), no evidence yet exists on the integration of mental health interventions. Similarly, there is scope for integrating mitigation and adaption concerns into brief psychological interventions (Gray et al., 2021). One example of this is an integrated disaster preparedness and mental health intervention whereby, in parallel with sessions on coping skills targeting disaster-related distress, participants receive hands-on training in disaster preparedness and response techniques. This intervention was shown to be effective in improving mental health and disaster preparedness in Nepal and Haiti (James et al., 2020; Welton-Mitchell et al., 2018). Similar interventions are likely to be highly relevant in the context of extreme weather events due to climate change.
| Conclusion|| |
Climate change is negatively impacting mental health through a variety of pathways. Specific interventions have yet to be tested or adapted to support mental health and wellbeing in the context of climate change. Brief psychological interventions represent an opportunity to fill this gap due to their demonstrated effectiveness following extreme weather events and other emergencies, their likely effectiveness in the context of more chronic climate stressors, their possible role in promotion and prevention, and their potential to address many of the implementation challenges that global climate change will trigger as well as to being integrated within other programmes, including mitigation and adaptation strategies. Effectiveness and implementation research is urgently needed to test these assumptions. While climate change will represent one of the key mental health challenges of the twenty-first century, brief psychological interventions are likely to represent one part of the range of solution that will be needed.
ICMJE criteria for authorship were used to define authorship. AM and JA conceptualised the work. AM drafted a first version of the manuscript and all authors contributed to it by revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final version.
The authors thank Kenneth Carswell for his comments and suggestions on the manuscript. The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of their respective institutions or of any agency. F.C. is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Early Career Fellowship (APP1138488).
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
AM is currently involved in evaluating an adaptation of PM+. JA is currently involved in the implementation and evaluation of SH+ and has worked on evaluations of CETA in the past.
1Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Chad, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Haiti, Niger, Somalia and Sudan.
| References|| |
Augustinavicius, J., Lowe, S., Massazza, A., Hayes, K., Denckla, C., White, R., Cabán-Alemán, C., Clayton, S., Verdeli, L., & Berry, H. L. (2021). Global climate change and trauma: An International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies Briefing Paper
Berry, H. L., Bowen, K., & Kjellstrom, T. (2010). Climate change and mental health: A causal pathways framework. International Journal of Public Health
(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-009-0112-0
Blackmore, R., Boyle, J. A., Fazel, M., Ranasinha, S., Gray, K. M., Fitzgerald, G., Misso, M., & Gibson-Helm, M. (2020). The prevalence of mental illness in refugees and asylum seekers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Medicine
(9), e1003337. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003337
Bogdanov, S., Augustinavicius, J., Bass, J. K., Metz, K., Skavenski, S., Singh, N. S., Moore, Q., Haroz, E. E., Kane, J., Doty, B., Murray, L., & Bolton, P. (2021). A randomized-controlled trial of community-based transdiagnostic psychotherapy for veterans and internally displaced persons in Ukraine. Global Mental Health
Bonilla-Escobar, F. J., Fandiño-Losada, A., Martínez-Buitrago, D. M., Santaella-Tenorio, J., Tobón-García, D., Muñoz-Morales, E. J., Escobar-Roldán, I. D., Babcock, L., Duarte-Davidson, E., Bass, J. K., Murray, L. K., Dorsey, S., Gutierrez-Martinez, M. I., & Bolton, P. (2018). A randomized controlled trial of a transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral intervention for Afro-descendants' survivors of systemic violence in Colombia. PLOS ONE
(12), e0208483. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208483
Charlson, F., Ali, S., Augustinavicius, J., Benmarhnia, T., Birch, S., Clayton, S., Fielding, K., Jones, L., Juma, D., Snider, L., Ugo, V., Zeitz, L., Jayawardana, D., La Nauze, A., & Massazza, A. (2022). Global priorities for climate change and mental health research. Environment International
, 106984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106984
Charlson, F., Ali, S., Benmarhnia, T., Pearl, M., Massazza, A., Augustinavicius, J., & Scott, J. G. (2021). Climate change and mental health: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
(9), 4486. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094486
Charlson, F., van Ommeren, M., Flaxman, A., Cornett, J., Whiteford, H., & Saxena, S. (2019). New WHO prevalence estimates of mental disorders in conflict settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet
(10194), 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30934-1
Chibanda, D., Bowers, T., Verhey, R., Rusakaniko, S., Abas, M., Weiss, H. A., & Araya, R. (2015). The Friendship Bench programme: A cluster randomised controlled trial of a brief psychological intervention for common mental disorders delivered by lay health workers in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Mental Health Systems
(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-015-0013-y
Cohen, F., & Yaeger, L. (2021). Task-shifting for refugee mental health and psychosocial support: A scoping review of services in humanitarian settings through the lens of RE-AIM. Implementation Research and Practice
, 2633489521998790. https://doi.org/10.1177/2633489521998790
Cunsolo, A., Harper, S. L., Minor, K., Hayes, K., Williams, K. G., & Howard, C. (2020). Ecological grief and anxiety: The start of a healthy response to climate change? The Lancet Planetary Health
(7), e261–e263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30144-3
Dawson, K. S., Watts, S., Carswell, K., Shehadeh, M. H., Jordans, M. J. D., Bryant, R. A., Miller, K. E., Malik, A., Brown, F. L., Servili, C., & van Ommeren, M. (2019). Improving access to evidence-based interventions for young adolescents: Early Adolescent Skills for Emotions (EASE). World Psychiatry
(1), 105–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20594
de Graaff, A. M., Cuijpers, P., McDaid, D., Park, A., Woodward, A., Bryant, R. A., Fuhr, D. C., Kieft, B., Minkenberg, E., & Sijbrandij, M. (2020). Peer-provided Problem Management Plus (PM+) for adult Syrian refugees: A pilot randomised controlled trial on effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Diffenbaugh, N. S., & Burke, M. (2019). Global warming has increased global economic inequality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
(20), 9808–9813. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816020116
Dozio, E., Dill, A. S., & Bizouerne, C. (2021). Problem Management Plus adapted for group use to improve mental health in a war-affected population in the Central African Republic. Intervention
(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.4103/INTV.INTV_36_20
Eaton, W. W., & Fallin, M. D. (Eds.). (2019). Public mental health
(2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Elshazly, M., Budosan, B., Alam, A. N. M. M., Khan, N. T., & Ventevogel, P. (2019). Challenges and opportunities for Rohingya mental health and psychosocial support programming. Intervention
(2), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.4103/INTV.INTV_49_19
Epping-Jordan, J. E., Harris, R., Brown, F. L., Carswell, K., Foley, C., García-Moreno, C., Kogan, C., & van Ommeren, M. (2016). Self-Help Plus (SH+): A new WHO stress management package. World Psychiatry
(3), 295–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20355
Fuhr, D. C., Acarturk, C., Sijbrandij, M., Brown, F. L., Jordans, M. J. D., Woodward, A., McGrath, M., Sondorp, E., Ventevogel, P., Ikkursun, Z., El Chammay, R., Cuijpers, P., & Roberts, B. (2020). Planning the scale up of brief psychological interventions using theory of change. BMC Health Services Research
(1), 801. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05677-6
Fuhr, D. C., Bogdanov, S., Tol, W. A., Nadkarni, A., & Roberts, B. (2021). Problem Management Plus and Alcohol (PM+A): A new intervention to address alcohol misuse and psychological distress among conflict-affected populations. Intervention
(1), 141–143. https://doi.org/10.4103/INTV.INTV_27_20
Goloktionova, A. E., & Mukerjee, M. (2021). Bringing Problem Management Plus to Ukraine: Reflections on the past and ways forward. Intervention
(1), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.4103/INTV.INTV_42_20
Gray, B., Eaton, J., Christy, J., Duncan, J., Hanna, F., & Kasi, S. (2021). A proactive approach: Examples for integrating disaster risk reduction and mental health and psychosocial support programming. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
, 102051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102051
Greene, M. C., Likindikoki, S., Rees, S., Bonz, A., Kaysen, D., Misinzo, L., Njau, T., Kiluwa, S., Turner, R., Ventevogel, P., Mbwambo, J. K. K., & Tol, W. A. (2021). Evaluation of an integrated intervention to reduce psychological distress and intimate partner violence in refugees: Results from the Nguvu cluster randomized feasibility trial. PLoS One
(6), e0252982. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252982
Haroz, E. E., Nguyen, A. J., Lee, C. I., Tol, W. A., Fine, S. L., & Bolton, P. (2020). What works in psychosocial programming in humanitarian contexts in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of the evidence. Intervention
(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.4103/INTV.INTV_6_19
Heim, E., Ramia, J. A., Hana, R. A., Burchert, S., Carswell, K., Cornelisz, I., Cuijpers, P., El Chammay, R., Noun, P., van Klaveren, C., van Ommeren, M., Zoghbi, E., & van't Hof, E. (2021). Step-by-step: Feasibility randomised controlled trial of a mobile-based intervention for depression among populations affected by adversity in Lebanon. Internet Interventions
, 100380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2021.100380
Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC). (2007). IASC Guidelines on Mental Health and Psychosocial Support in Emergency Settings
. Inter-Agency Standing Committee. https://doi.org/10.1037/e518422011-002
James, L. E., Welton-Mitchell, C., Noel, J. R., & James, A. S. (2020). Integrating mental health and disaster preparedness in intervention: A randomized controlled trial with earthquake and flood-affected communities in Haiti. Psychological Medicine
(2), 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291719000163
Jordans, M. J. D., & Kohrt, B. A. (2020). Scaling up mental health care and psychosocial support in low-resource settings: A roadmap to impact. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Jordans, M. J. D., Kohrt, B. A., Sangraula, M., Turner, E. L., Wang, X., Shrestha, P., Ghimire, R., van't Hof, E., Bryant, R. A., Dawson, K. S., Marahatta, K., Luitel, N. P., & van Ommeren, M. (2021). Effectiveness of Group Problem Management Plus, a brief psychological intervention for adults affected by humanitarian disasters in Nepal: A cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS Medicine
(6), e1003621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003621
Khan, M. N., Hamdani, S. U., Chiumento, A., Dawson, K., Bryant, R. A., Sijbrandij, M., Nazir, H., Akhtar, P., Masood, A., Wang, D., Wang, E., Uddin, I., van Ommeren, M., & Rahman, A. (2019). Evaluating feasibility and acceptability of a group WHO trans-diagnostic intervention for women with common mental disorders in rural Pakistan: A cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796017000336
Leku, M.R., Ndlovu, J., Aldridge, L., Bourey, C., Tol, W. A., Augustinavicius, J.L. (Under review). SH+ 360: A novel model for scaling up a mental health and psychosocial support program in humanitarian settings.
Mach, K. J., Kraan, C. M., Adger, W. N., Buhaug, H., Burke, M., Fearon, J. D., Field, C. B., Hendrix, C. S., Maystadt, J.-F., O'Loughlin, J., Roessler, P., Scheffran, J., Schultz, K. A., & von Uexkull, N. (2019). Climate as a risk factor for armed conflict. Nature
(7764), 193–197. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1300-6
McBride, K. A., Harrison, S., Mahata, S., Pfeffer, K., Cardamone, F., Ngigi, T., Kohrt, B. A., Pedersen, G. A., Greene, C., Viljoen, D., Muneghina, O., & Brown, A. D. (2021). Building mental health and psychosocial support capacity during a pandemic: The process of adapting Problem Management Plus for remote training and implementation during COVID-19 in New York City, Europe and East Africa. Intervention
(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.4103/INTV.INTV_30_20
Murray, L. K., Hall, B. J., Dorsey, S., Ugueto, A. M., Puffer, E. S., Sim, A., Ismael, A., Bass, J., Akiba, C., Lucid, L., Harrison, J., Erikson, A., & Bolton, P. A. (2018). An evaluation of a common elements treatment approach for youth in Somali refugee camps. Global Mental Health
, e16. https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2018.7
Murray, L. K., Kane, J. C., Glass, N., Wyk, S. S. van, Melendez, F., Paul, R., Danielson, C. K., Murray, S. M., Mayeya, J., Simenda, F., & Bolton, P. (2020). Effectiveness of the Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) in reducing intimate partner violence and hazardous alcohol use in Zambia (VATU): A randomized controlled trial. PLOS Medicine
(4), e1003056. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003056
Nemiro, A., Hof, E. V., & Constant, S. (2021). After the randomised controlled trial: Implementing Problem Management Plus through humanitarian agencies: Three case studies from Ethiopia, Syria and Honduras. Intervention
(1), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.4103/INTV.INTV_34_20
Ojala, M., Cunsolo, A., Ogunbode, C. A., & Middleton, J. (2021). Anxiety, worry, and grief in a time of environmental and climate crisis: A narrative review. Annual Review of Environment and Resources
(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-022716
Papola, D., Purgato, M., Gastaldon, C., Bovo, C., van Ommeren, M., Barbui, C., & Tol, W. A. (2020). Psychological and social interventions for the prevention of mental disorders in people living in low- and middle-income countries affected by humanitarian crises. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
, CD012417. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012417.pub2
Patel, V., Saxena, S., Lund, C., Thornicroft, G., Baingana, F., Bolton, P., Chisholm, D., Collins, P. Y., Cooper, J. L., Eaton, J., Herrman, H., Herzallah, M. M., Huang, Y., Jordans, M. J. D., Kleinman, A., Medina-Mora, M. E., Morgan, E., Niaz, U., Omigbodun, O., … UnÜtzer, Jü. (2018). The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development. The Lancet
(10157), 1553–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31612-X
Purgato, M., Carswell, K., Tedeschi, F., Acarturk, C., Anttila, M., Au, T., Bajbouj, M., Baumgartner, J., Biondi, M., Churchill, R., Cuijpers, P., Koesters, M., Gastaldon, C., Ilkkursun, Z., Lantta, T., Nosè, M., Ostuzzi, G., Papola, D., Popa, M., … Barbui, C. (2021). Effectiveness of Self-Help Plus in Preventing Mental Disorders in Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Western Europe: A multinational randomized controlled trial. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1159/000517504
Purgato, M., Gastaldon, C., Papola, D., van Ommeren, M., Barbui, C., & Tol, W. A. (2018). Psychological therapies for the treatment of mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries affected by humanitarian crises. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
, CD011849. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011849.pub2
Rahman, A., Riaz, N., Dawson, K. S., Usman Hamdani, S., Chiumento, A., Sijbrandij, M., Minhas, F., Bryant, R. A., Saeed, K., van Ommeren, M., & Farooq, S. (2016). Problem Management Plus (PM+): Pilot trial of a WHO transdiagnostic psychological intervention in conflict-affected Pakistan. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)
(2), 182–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20312
Ryan, G. K., Bauer, A., Endale, T., Qureshi, O., Doukani, A., Cerga-Pashoja, A., Brar, S. K., Eaton, J., & Bass, J. K. (2021). Lay-delivered talk therapies for adults affected by humanitarian crises in low- and middle-income countries. Conflict and Health
(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-021-00363-8
Sikander, S., Ahmad, I., Atif, N., Zaidi, A., Vanobberghen, F., Weiss, H. A., Nisar, A., Tabana, H., Ain, Q. U., Bibi, A., Bilal, S., Bibi, T., Liaqat, R., Sharif, M., Zulfiqar, S., Fuhr, D. C., Price, L. N., Patel, V., & Rahman, A. (2019). Delivering the Thinking Healthy Programme for perinatal depression through volunteer peers: A cluster randomised controlled trial in Pakistan. The Lancet. Psychiatry
(2), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30467-X
Tay, A. K., Mung, H. K., Miah, M. A. A., Balasundaram, S., Ventevogel, P., Badrudduza, M., Khan, S., Morgan, K., Rees, S., Mohsin, M., & Silove, D. (2020). An integrative adapt therapy for common mental health symptoms and adaptive stress amongst Rohingya, Chin, and Kachin refugees living in Malaysia: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS Medicine
(3), e1003073. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003073
Tol, W. A. (2015). Stemming the tide: Promoting mental health and preventing mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries. Global Mental Health (Cambridge, England)
, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2015.9
Tol, W. A., Leku, M. R., Lakin, D. P., Carswell, K., Augustinavicius, J., Adaku, A., Au, T. M., Brown, F. L., Bryant, R. A., Garcia-Moreno, C., Musci, R. J., Ventevogel, P., White, R. G., & van Ommeren, M. (2020). Guided self-help to reduce psychological distress in South Sudanese female refugees in Uganda: A cluster randomised trial. The Lancet Global Health
(2), e254–e263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30504-2
Troup, J., Fuhr, D. C., Woodward, A., Sondorp, E., & Roberts, B. (2021). Barriers and facilitators for scaling up mental health and psychosocial support interventions in low- and middle-income countries for populations affected by humanitarian crises: A systematic review. International Journal of Mental Health Systems
(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-020-00431-1
Weiss, W. M., Murray, L. K., Zangana, G. A. S., Mahmooth, Z., Kaysen, D., Dorsey, S., Lindgren, K., Gross, A., Murray, S. M., Bass, J. K., & Bolton, P. (2015). Community-based mental health treatments for survivors of torture and militant attacks in Southern Iraq: A randomized control trial. BMC Psychiatry
(1), 249. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0622-7
Welton-Mitchell, C., James, L. E., Khanal, S. N., & James, A. S. (2018). An integrated approach to mental health and disaster preparedness: A cluster comparison with earthquake affected communities in Nepal. BMC Psychiatry
(1), 296. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1863-z
Woodward, A., Dieleman, M. A., Sondorp, E., Roberts, B., Fuhr, D. C., Ventevogel, P., Sijbrandij, M., Broerse, J. E. W., on behalf of the STRENGTHS consortium (2021). A system innovation perspective on the potential for scaling up new psychological interventions for refugees. Intervention
(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.4103/INTV.INTV_29_20
World Health Organisation (WHO). (2017). Scalable psychological interventions for people in communities affected by adversity: A new area of mental health and psychosocial work at WHO
Zang, Y., Hunt, N., & Cox, T. (2014). Adapting narrative exposure therapy for Chinese earthquake survivors: A pilot randomised controlled feasibility study. BMC Psychiatry
, 262. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-014-0262-3