• Users Online: 1129
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 17  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 69-75

The case for—and challenges of—faith-sensitive psychosocial programming

1 Independent Consultant, Edinburgh, UK
2 Regional Programme Coordinator, Lutheran World Federation, Geneva, Switzerland
3 Policy and Strategy Manager, Islamic Relief, Birmingham, UK
4 Institute for Global Health and Development, Edinburgh, U.K. and Professor of Population and Family Health, Columbia University, New York, USA

Correspondence Address:
Michael French
Lutheran World Federation World Service, PO Box 2100, Route de Ferney 150, CH-1211 Geneva 2
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/INTV.INTV_20_18

Rights and Permissions

Drawing upon evidence compiled in a recent literature review, we identify five arguments for seeking faith-sensitivity in psychosocial programming: it is indicated by the Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) Guidelines on Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS); it is implied by humanitarian law and principles; religion is an active and effective source of coping in many contexts; local faith actors have a ‘comparative advantage’ in humanitarian settings; and engaging with religion is coherent with emerging policy and practice. However, we also identify three major challenges in implementing faith-sensitive programming: religion may be used as a basis for maladaptive coping; religious engagement is considered a threat to impartiality; and practices of engaging with religion are poorly documented, disseminated and developed. This suggests the value of guidance on faith-sensitive psychosocial programming—consistent with the existing IASC MHPSS guidelines—suitable for implementation by both faith-based and non-faith-based actors.
Key implications for practice
  • The role of faith in supporting well-being and recovery and the importance of engaging with local capacities and institutions both point to the relevance of faith-sensitive psychosocial programming.
  • Humanitarian law and principles promote respect for religious practice and freedom of religion.
  • Humanitarian agencies are potentially discouraged from engaging with religion by concerns about partiality, proselytism and the potential for religion to ferment conflict.
  • There is a need to develop, document and disseminate appropriate faith-sensitive programming practices more effectively.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded603    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal